Skip to content

Security in Platform One💣

Core Tenets💣

  • Secure the DoD
  • Security first approach - but with mindfulness of timelines
  • Automation
  • Avoid manual processes - by automating
  • Standards/Continuous Monitoring
  • Observability layers can continuously monitoring of compliance over time.
  • Multi-Party Validation
  • Have multiple sets of eyes that are checking the products coming through the pipeline. P1 likes to promote pair programming to help with this.

PlatformOne - Security Offerings💣

  • IronBank Registry
  • IB registry for hardened container images (registry1.dso.mil)
  • IronBank VAT
  • Vulnerability Assessment Tracker (vat.dso.mil)
  • GUI with APIs access to evidence to speed up accreditation of images
  • Weekly IronBank Onboarding, AMA, and get unblocked sessions
  • https://p1.dso.mil/#/products/iron-bank/
  • Note: only vendors can harden vendor images
  • CNAP
  • Cloud Native Access Point (Advanced perimeter firewall, that enables secure access to IL2, IL4, and IL5 Resources from the public internet, P1 SSO managed by CNAP team)
  • Various other services
  • Onboarding, pen testing, and more.

Automateing Security💣

  • IronBank rebuilds & rescans their images every 12 hours. This ensures fixes to the upstream base image can be added.
  • BigBang’s UHC Pattern and every 2 week release cycle makes it easy to pull in the latest version of images. in ~/Desktop/bootstrap/dev/kustomization.yaml there’s a reference to the version of the BigBang helm Chart. When you update that it cases a cascading effect that updates the versions of all images maintained by BigBang.

ATO vs cATO💣

ATO💣

  • Based on RMF and Security Controls and their implementation for an iteration
  • Places focus on the the system
  • Works better with the traditional Waterfall/Spiral SDLC
  • Changes to the system might warrant a re-evaluation of the ATO cycle
  • Traditionally ATO is issued to the system as whole
  • Does not lend to easier Reciprocity across platforms

cATO💣

  • Also based on RMF and Security Controls but focus on the process that spans multiple iterations
  • Places focus on the development process instead of the system
  • Better fit for the modern agile methodologies
  • Allows teams to develop and deploy continuously without having to re-evaluate ATO for each change
  • Swapping out the layers (Infra and Platform) with equivalent ATOs helps preserves cATO and CtF of the Application which lends to Easier Reciprocity across platforms (arguably)

Continuous Authorization💣

C-ATO

C-ATO Overview

PlatformOne Security Objectives💣

Security is core to P1’s Mission

“Serve cyber mission application teams in their journey to deliver rapid mission capability with technical expertise and services”

  • Provide secure, resilient and robust development environment
  • Facilitate CtF - Certificate To Field
  • Secure development - focus on high quality code practices, automation, monitoring and compliance
  • Secure deployment - rely on the ATO of the infrastructure and platform layers

Security Objectives

Process💣

1.0 Authorize the Platform💣

Step 1.0

2.0 Authorize the Platform💣

Steop 2.0

3.0 Authorize the Process💣

Step 3.0

Continuous Monitoring💣

Continuous Monitoring

P1 and cATO💣

BigBang clusters are capable of receiving a cATO.

IronBank, PartyBus, and other P1 services are hosted on top of BigBang Clusters. P1’s AO was able to sign off on P1 services receiving a cATO, because of people, processes, and technology.

  • In addition to the BigBang Platform Technology
  • Trained, approved, vetted people are developing and maintaining the services.
  • and are following processes that have been approved by the AO.

EX: PartyBus has a process for developer built images to be blessed to run in production on the cATO’d environment, they call it the CTF (Certificate to Field).